Here's the Link
Here's the article
SMART black blazers are now a common sight across Barrow each
weekday morning as 1,800 children make their way to the town's new
secondary school.
All I will say about the designer jackets, they
are not blazers, is that they would look smart if they actually fitted.
They are wet designer jackets more often than not as we enter a wet
autumnal period. Where their waterproof jackets are is anyone's guess.
Furness Academy, for 11 to 16-year-olds, opened its doors in
September at the former Thorncliffe and Parkview Schools. The academy
not only replaced those two schools, but Alfred Barrow School as well. It is sponsored by Barrow Sixth Form College, Furness College and the University of Cumbria.
Douglas Blackledge, the principal and chief executive of Furness
Academy, has praised the pupils, staff and parents for helping it get
off to a good start in building a reputation as a successful secondary
school.
And
so he should. These very people have been dragged through hell for this
school to be brought into existence. Where he gets it wrong is that
it's only a few weeks old and reputations are earned over time. It will
only be classed a success by the individual pupils who are the only
people who really matter when they get their GCSE/Diploma results in
the summer.
Alongside the day-to-day running of the academy, Mr Blackledge is
working with local education authority Cumbria County Council and
consultants Capita Symonds to develop the academy's accommodation
schedule and then the outline business case for the new,
multi-million-pound buildings. They are set to be ready at both sites
for 2012.
This
seems to be pure fantasy. It's as though the fact that the country is
deep in debt has totally passed these people by. The outline business
case is a load of tosh. I've read a lot of them and they all follow the
same formulaic outline so all of them get 'passed'. They are as big a
waste of time as the 'Expression of Interest' documents. Still keeps
some pen pushers and the Capita Symonds crew in a job.
Mr Blackledge said: "I would like to commend the staff, students and
their families for all their efforts in ensuring that Furness Academy
is quickly becoming something that Barrow can take pride in. I
appreciate that little has changed in terms of buildings and structures
at this stage. However, additional ICT and improved social, toilet and changing facilities have gone down well with students.
"Alongside this, plans for our new facilities in 2012 are
progressing well and I look forward to discussing these plans with the
community soon. Already I believe that the academy is developing a positive ethos
and identity, which bodes very well for our future. For example, over
the last six weeks all staff have taken great pleasure in hearing the
many positive comments from local businesses and others in the Barrow
community about the appearance and behaviour of students."
Douglas is in fine form here. Anne will be proud.
Saying all the right things about all the right people to the right
people. It's as though the whole town used to constantly complain about
Thorncliffe, Alfred Barrow and Parkview. However we can forgive him for
this as he's only been in Dalton/Barrow since late February 2009.
Mr Blackledge said this good attitude is also becoming increasingly apparent in the classroom.
At the end of September and start of October, staff and students
worked together to put on two open days to show prospective students
and their parents what the academy offers.
They welcomed more than 400 people who were able to get involved in
a range of activities. The activities included medieval banquets, drama
displays, science experiments, trampolining and climbing.
Mr Blackledge said: "The comments given to us via the feedback forms
said that it was great to see that everyone who was involved was taking
so much pride in what they were doing."
Don't believe they took any notice of 'feedback
forms'. Sorry Douglas all feedback to date since the idea was first
announced way back in 2007 has been totally ignored by those that think
they matter.
The curriculum is based around three learning zones; science and
technology, creative and performance and community, culture and
communications. Pupils have individual learning plans and are guided by
learning group leaders.
Mr Blackledge said: "I would particularly like to pass on my thanks
to students and convey how well they are integrating with their new
peers. Nowhere is it more evident than on the sports field, where our
Year 11 rugby team emerged triumphant and undefeated in a five-way
tournament."
Clutching
at straws a bit with the rugby win. There were two teams in from the
Academy, that's how they got the five way tournament. Even worse the new 'unique' Identity Limited rugby shirts are NOT REVERSIBLE so the North site team had to play in Thorncliffe shirts when they played the South site!
At the very start of term there were problems that needed ironing out.
One issue raised by a parent in the first week was that students who
had collected meals in the dining hall at South Site - the former
Parkview School - had to wait for seats as it was full.
There were a lot more pressing 'issues' than this but lets not have any negativity. The exact same issue was prevalent when the South site was Parkview so it seems the Academy Company hasn't learned.
Mr Blackledge said: "I am not saying that there haven't been any
teething troubles that needed to be resolved over the opening few weeks.
One such problem was that of power cuts on the North Site (the
former Thorncliffe School) but these are mainly behind us now and I am
confident that staff, students and the community are working hard
together to ensure that the academy can, and will, be the best that it
can be."
Power cuts that were caused by the headlong rush
for the September opening that could easily have been avoided by a
thing called planning. As it is the County contractors were scheduled
to do work on the power system but once the Academy was signed off it
became the responsibility of the Academy company.
The principal heads the senior leadership team, which also includes
the vice principals and directors. Gordon Wilson is the vice principal
of school organisation and head of South Site. Kevin Gill is the vice
principal of school improvement and head of North Site.
The establishment of an academy for Barrow was controversial. Before
the school was up and running, it faced opposition and even protests.
There were calls to delay the opening by 12 months.
Parents and others in the community were concerned the accelerated
plans would disrupt children's education and they did not feel there
had been enough information.
The irony of this statement coming from a reporter from the towns sole newspaper!
But others have said they want the academy to succeed and will
monitor the school to see it delivers the top class education and
facilities that have been promised.
Who are these mysterious 'others'?
Now it's been forced upon the town it has to succeed. Failure is not
an option for the Academy Company as they have made cast iron promises
to the pupils of the school and everyone is watching very closely to
see if they deliver.
Barrow and Furness MP John Hutton said: "I am in fact visiting
Furness Academy on Friday, when I hope to be advised on what progress
is being made to date in its development. I was pleased that despite
what became a somewhat tight timescale, approval was given for the
creation of the academy and that the independent Ofsted inspection
confirmed that all appropriate measures were in place for this to occur.
"It is, of course, very early days and I know that all concerned
will be working hard to ensure its success so that our young people
have the best possible education provided to them.
"I hope all who are concerned with supporting young people will put
their energies into constructively supporting the team in the school
and that through partnership working and determined commitment, we can
ensure our young people can maximise their opportunities."
Blimey I though he'd retired already. What a
waste of space this man is but still he is saying all the right things
about all the right people to the right people so he can still 'stay on
message'.
An academy spokeswoman said parent and staff governors will be elected later this term.
"There will be further parental representative positions available
in the near future on the sub-committees - finance, audit, quality and
human resources," she added.
'An Academy SPOKESWOMAN'. That's terrible. If you
are speaking on behalf of an institution you should always give your
name. Perhaps I'me being too harsh and the lady did giver her name and
the reporter simply forgot it or removed it to make the copy fit the
space. Either way if the Evening Mail didn't print anything from
unnamed 'spokes people' then they could make the Evening Mail a few
pages less save themselves a fortune on newsprint costs!
So all things considered I suppose the best thing that could be said is that it could have been much worse. At least it doesn't appear to be going down the same plug hole that Richard Rose did which has to be a good thing.
I cannot really see the point of the article other than giving the impression that the Evening Mail has it's finger on the pulse. So by extraction this commented article is an equal waste of time but given that the Academy Company has now defaulted to it's standard practice of 'saying nothing' so beloved by it's invisible and silent sponsors other than the usual expulsions over petty misdemeanours, the odd phone theft (under reported in the Mail. Can't have negativity remember!), the increasingly bizarre canteen meus being adopted and the liberal use of the victorian era 'isolation booths' there is nothing much to report.
North site is having an extended form period on Friday, is that so they can keep them locked up while Mr. Hutton visits :)
Another missed lesson to go with the extended summer holiday and two inset days in the middle of a vital period for year 10's and 11's.
I have a partner in the Academy and here are the facts, all are not what they seem:
1) The Academy is not meeting their duty of safeguarding the children. I know for a fact if OFSTED were to investigate them at any time they would go into special measures under OFSTED's new safeguarding legislation, due to their inability to keep an accurate record of all children's daily attendance.
2) There has already been in the region of 200 exclusions to date and this does not include those people who have been asked to go home and correct their uniform/appearance. Other schools cannot do this as their absence would go through the roof. Academies are exempt from reporting this and therefore can please themselves.
3) Telephones not working, emails not working, parents unable to contact staff, registers not being marked, not knowing if pupils are in or out, they have a duty of care to know where ALL children are at any given time - SOMETHING THAT EVERY PARENT WOULD BE HORRIFIED AT THE THOUGHT OF!
4) The timetable is a sham!
5) Dougie's girlfriend is swanning about as if she's a gangsters moll
6) If parents dug a little deeper under the swans nice shiny coat, they will see the legs going ten to the dozen. And unfortunately in this case, going backwards!!!!!!
Hi Concerned.
Have to agree the registration system is not up to scratch yet. Communications between members of staff are not quite up there yet. (e.g. not passing on info that a form teacher is sick and not providing cover, so register not taken for 2 days).
This should right itself in time once everyone knows their responsibilities properly. Hope they sort it quickly because, as you say, special measures are not too far away if it isn't.
Not sure whose timetables are a sham but ours are OK…so far.
Have rung in and managed to speak to someone I wanted to on more than one occasion, granted it was not a teacher I wanted to get hold of, so I have not tested that.
I think some of us parents are aware of large gaps in the swan’s feathers. There needs to be an analysis done to see what is not working, perhaps Dougies promised questionnaire for parents may help them. I am not holding my breath that we get one though.
I would like to add to my last comment, what a sterling job 'most' staff are doing under difficult circumstances.
That alone, we parents are extremely grateful for.
Do parent's have a right to call in OFSTED if they know the school is failing our children? Please let me know, this is a matter of urgency and I would be happy to make an official complaint to OFSTED.
At the inset day last Friday it was discussed there will only be a ONE SITE ACADEMEY. And the reason Why? COST!!!!! Can any teacher reading this site please confirm this for us? Thank you. Can I add you are all doing a fantastic job in holding things together for the sake of our kids. We are truely grateful. Thank you, Thank you!
A little light hearted humour now! Did you hear the one about the seagull who entered the Principal's Office at the North Site through an open window and proceeded to leave his 'opinion' all over the place. How very apt!!!!!
The timetable is a sham because if you are bright at maths and average at English and science, you will be grouped into the middle band for all - the only reason for this is ease for the people responsible for the timetable. I could go on but it makes my blood boil.
DAVE - any parent can contact OFSTED, here is a link to their whistleblowing section of their website: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/Ofsted-home/About-us/Contact-us/Safeguarding-children-Ofsted-s-whistleblower-hotline
Every parent has a right to be concerned regarding their children.
Every parent should know that there are senior members of the education department working in the Academy because it's just such a sham at the moment. Dougie being paid £135,000 a year with the potential of a £60,000 bonus, why is he still there, what's he doing when senior members are in there trying to stop it going into special measures. He's basically being paid for nothing
Dave
This is what OFSTED informed me in the past, about procedure when the schools were local authority schools.
They said…OFSTED’s role is to inspect and report on schools, they do not regulate them.
They can only consider whether to investigate complaints made about schools which qualify under OFSTED’s powers. One of the qualifying criteria for complaints is that you have to follow school's complaints procedure, including making a formal complaint to the governing body. You also have to follow relevant local authorities complaints procedure, (if that is relevant now it is an academy) before you make a complaint to OFSTED.
Perhaps complaints to the school and governing body will do the trick especially as they may be unaware of the problems themselves and how much we parents know.
By the sound of it thank God there are senior members of the education department there. Goodness knows what would be happening otherwise.
I had not realised the sets had been juggled in such a way. Don't just let your blood boil, please tell us more, we need to know as much as we can.
Senior members were in Richard Rose for a long time and look what happened to that. The timetable is created not for the benefit of the pupils but for the staff and those managing the timetable. The timetable of all three schools to be amalgamated into one was always going to be a huge undertaking. There are year 7 kids in the Academy who are very good at English (and I mean very good) but because they are average/poor at Maths, they AVERAGE their abilities and therefore have to attend middle sets for English as well as Maths and Science. Therefore not fulfilling their potential within English (not pushing them at all).
Also, because of the learning zones, many Educationalists have expressed their concerns that's it's almost a Primary style timetable.
I urge parents to REALLY look what's going on in the Academy, they are failing there first primary objective - SAFEGUARDING OUR CHILDREN! - Imagine this, my friends daughter was marked in for 2 days when they were absent. And when they came back, they were marked absent when she was in. What would happen if there was a fire, who knows whether she's in or out - VERY VERY WORRYING!
What's more worrying is the author of this site (who I once thought was bang on and respected him for his efforts) is being hoodwinked into thinking everything seems to be just OK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hello Concerned.
I have less 'inside' knowledge than I used to as we are home schooling one son and the other has left to go to the sixth form, don't get me started on how bad the Sixth Form is. Also many people who tell me things ask me NOT to put it on the blog!
However don't for a second think that Douglas or the Evening Mail can hoodwink me into believing that everything in the garden is rosy. I am simply giving the Academy time to adjust. Don't forget there are 1700 kids in this brand new school and they need to be given time to adjust to the new regime as it's their education that is at risk.
Just because I don't publish every story I get to hear about doesn't mean I won't at some point in the future. Now is not the right time for a lot of them, in my estimation.
Watch out for the next post as it will REAlLY shed some light on what is going on inside the new company school.
Regards
Derek
Concerned, which site does your partner work at?
I only ask as I've heard differing tales from each site, one site being far worse than the other.
I have also been hearing horror stories regarding the North Site.
Children missing, not bothering to attend and no record of who is there and who is not. Also what a shambles with the sets. I know my child is not getting the level of education previously received at Parkview. It is all very worrying but hey ho the Evening Mail is yet again doing the Academy propaganda and not telling it like it is. Lord Haw Haw springs to mind. The truth will never be told by this editor
If a school has an inspection and fails on safeguarding they fail on everything else, even if judged to be outstanding in other areas.Apparently these are the rules that now apply.I was informed of this by a teacher friend.So if what you are saying about safeguarding at the Academy is true it's not looking good.We can complain all day long but someone really needs to get this sorted our children deserve to be cared for appropriately.Reguarding the absence and non absence of your friend's daughter I would suggest that if he/she has not already done so they go in and "play holy heel".
Teachers have been told that there will only be one site eventually. One of the reasons is Orange's exorbitant comms costs at Thorncliffe, something to do with the radio mast I think. Can a teacher confirm this?
Thank goodness I have left the building.
Do they actually need a 'reason' to 'change their minds'?
I know it's hardly on the same level but look at the logo on each kids uniform and tell me that is the same as the one the sponsors went to great lengths to craft with parental and pupil help and promoted through the august pages of the local paper and the odd purple newsletter!
There was only ever going to be one site in my opinion as I know for a fact the only reason for the two was a little letter from an ex-Defence minister who was doing his bit to show his public that he was 'in touch' with them, as if.
Moira and her councillors always favoured one site and their consultation documents were built to deliver a one site school.
Simple economics means the County Council can make more money from selling off the Thorncliffe site because of it's location on the edge of Hawcoat. Parkviews land is slap bang in the middle of town and is largely surrounded by council houses. Ergo the Thorncliffe land is more attractive to developers as they can charge a premium on each house built and they will.
Sad to say there are enough morons in Barrow who will fall for the 'premium' or 'executive' tag and the developers know this so THEY will make a killing. So perhaps the town is actually getting exactly what it deserves.
But keep it quiet as we the plebs are not supposed to be able to work this out for ourselves.
If there are horror stories, are they prolific or is it one or two incidents?
Please list how many incidents in detail as we could be in danger of blowing things out of proportion and winding each other up.
Heresay and I heard it from someone, is not good enough evidence to nail anyone.
The only incident that I know is true, is a form teacher not being replaced for two days, so registration was not taken.
Could the problems have anything to do with attendance officer being based at south site?
Let's have some more details.