Why they can't just say this is beyond me but moving on.
May 2009 Archives
Why they can't just say this is beyond me but moving on.
Gordon Brown wants Ed Balls as Chancellor!
Link
GORDON BROWN is ready to promote Ed Balls, his closest political ally, to chancellor this week in a high-stakes gamble to restore Labour's political fortunes.
According to a top-level leak from Downing Street, the prime minister wants to make the appointment the centrepiece of a sweeping reshuffle on Friday, after the local and European polls.
With Balls, the schools secretary, one of the most divisive figures in
government, the move would be a huge risk, which could trigger a ferocious
backlash within the Labour party that could spiral into a leadership
challenge.
According to the well-placed insider, Brown has been working on the scheme to make Balls chancellor since the expenses debacle engulfed Westminster, taking a handful of his closest aides into his confidence.
Brown knows the appointment would be highly controversial and is ruminating over the possible consequences. However, Balls's elevation would fit into a wider strategy to position Labour for the next general election, which rests on hopes of an upturn in Britain's economic fortunes just before polling day.
Balls, who is widely respected in the City, could appear a younger, fresher face than Alistair Darling to take on George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, in the run-up to the elections.
Again if you are so inclined please e-mail this list to John Hutton and Peter Mackay.
So lets see what they have to say and before everyone moans about bad grammar and typos etc go and read the Job application pack that the Sponsors put together for the post of principal but most of all remember this is the text generation speaking!
If anybody is so inclined they can e-mail the link to this page to John Hutton or Peter Mackay.
- Who paid for the formation of the Limited Company?
- Who are its directors?
- Who is it's company secretary?
- Why is it's business address the Sixth form Colleges address?
- Why does a school need to be a company?
- Why wasn't its creation made public?
I cannot answer any of these questions but its one more example of the sponsor 'keeping people fully informed'!
Link
"Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary, has already conceded the party will perform badly.
If Labour loses control of the four county councils it is defending on Thursday and gets under 20 per cent of the vote in the European elections, Mr Brown could face a challenge from within his Cabinet - with Alan Johnson, the Health Secretary, set to emerge as his likeliest successor.
The Prime Minister is thought to be planning a sweeping Cabinet reshuffle next week in an attempt to reassert his political authority."In the very near future Ed Balls will no longer be the Minister for Education.
Question is who is likely to replace him and what would the possible impact be on the Academy plans?
Again who?
Well it's those pesky governors minutes again revealing all sorts of things that have been going on 'behind the scenes' as it were.
Yes yet another 'hidden' face is revealed. Not literally of course but Hank Williams has 'something' to do with the creation process as he met with the three head teachers as you can see in this excerpt from Parkview Governor minutes Link
"Rob felt that the preceding headteachers shared a strong sense of purpose and a real will to make things work. The three heads and another member of staff had met with a Creative Partnership management consultant Hank Williams. A project is being set up to run sessions for the students to contribute to the planning of the Academy."
We also see this line in the minutes which is a little disturbing, in my opinion;
"The new consultation document had only just been finalised and Rob was happy to report that both the sponsors and the preceding headteachers had contributed to the drafting of it. Debate would be out in the open and the date for the consultation meeting at Parkview will take place on:"
Which would suggest that 'debate' such as it was wasn't opened up until the correct answers could be all but guaranteed!
The Sponsors, Mr Blackledge and Mouchel have all along said that the quality of the staff is excellent and basically everything in the garden is rosy. To those of us on the outside peering in through the window courtesy of our children this has been fanciful at best and utterly wrong at worst.
As I have gone through document after document it has become a sadly unifying fact that words rarely equal actions when it comes to anything Academy.
It is obvious to everyone involved despite what the Sponsors et al were saying getting rid of Alfred Barrow and farming it's pupils out to the other schools would mean that one third of the staff currently employed would lose their jobs.
If you were one of those staff who had to earn money like everyone else, benefit scroungers aside, to pay your way in life would you put that at risk no matter what you saw, heard or knew was going on?
I certainly wouldn't. A bad job is better than no job especially in these bizarre credit crunch times.
However on Friday The Sponsors and Mr Blackledge revealed their hand with devastating consequences and so the teachers began to blow the whistle.
Planned, incompetence, naivety, mistake, bad judgement, someone in Mouchels fault, or just their way of doing it?
The real truth will likely never surface so we are left to form our own conclusions, again.
The truth in this instance doesn't really matter because what's done is done and coming on the back of the alleged uniform order and the alleged pre planned logo design it doesn't look like Barrows Academy would be second class never mind adequate no matter how much money is thrown at it.
This is ludicrous of course as some people will be all for it, some may want it but have reservations, others will be dead set against it but see no prospect of stopping it but I still see the same argument drawn out across the Evening Mail comment boards as a good reason for 'getting behind the Academy plan'.
Yes this was my first reaction when I first heard about them but according to my sons they are really good people who care and will take the time to listen when the teaching staff are unable too and they both see their schools officers as really valuable members of staff. They also see them as someone inside the school who is not 'part' of the school and say they can talk to them in confidence.
Unless they open their mouths we can only presume that they condone the actions of the 'Blackledge team' at Parkview. If this is the case then our kids are REALLY in trouble come September, unless the 'Parkview Kids' can do their job for them!
He must have been under pressure from the 'principal in waiting' and 'The Sponsors' but he has shown immense good sense in my opinion. My opinion counts for once because I have two children in Mr Swale's school one of whom is sitting a GCSE exam on Monday morning along with all of his Year group and another on Monday afternoon.
Both were 'stressed out' at the treatment of some of the members of Parkview staff by the sponsors, their principal elect and presumably Mouchel last Friday and both will be joining the protest as will every child they have been in contact with over the holidays.
My wife and I will also be there supporting these my children and their friends and contemporaries because I have yet to hear from any of them that they want the Academy to come into being and I have yet to hear any adult of my acquaintance support the plan.
We will be complying with the police and Mr Swales request and staying outside of the school grounds.
I doubt I would be able to meet and say thank you to Mr Swales for doing this for his pupils so let me say it here.
Thanks Mr Swales for showing some real trust in your pupils. They will do you and themselves proud of that I am sure.
At last the County Council is getting round to having a meeting to talk about possibly making a bid for BSF funding. The scheme has only been in existence since 2003, when the County submitted it's first Expression of Interest and building began in other counties in 2005.
Here we are once again 'the most rural county in England' late to the party because... well I have no idea why.
So what have 'they decided'?
Here in Barrow we 'The Sponsors' spending £45 million the creation of ONE.
So what is really happening in Barrow is a massive reduction in choice for parents and a massive reduction in the number of GCSE courses for pupils.
When the diplomas finally get up to full strength there will be 18 available for all Year 9's. The same 18 will be on offer across every school.
With there being only three schools remaining, should these sponsors get their way then the number of different GCSE courses cannot help but dramatically diminish this putting a vocational straight jacket on our kids.
I am not going to name him because if nothing else he had the balls or the brass neck, whichever is your point of view, to actually attend the meeting and not sit at home in silence like the rest of his colleagues who you and I elected to represent our views and have taken no part whatsoever in any of the recent debate surrounding the kids protest.
Shame on them.
They must be terrified of 'saying the wrong thing' or being seen to be 'on the losing side'.
There are variations and exclusions to this but in essence this is what it's all about.
The Mouchel spokesperson responded to a question asked by someone in the audience which went along the lines of;
"What is the very latest the plans can slip without the agreement being signed if the Academy is to open as planned in September next year?"
Their reply was along the lines of "The end of April, if we are being realistic"
Well blow me if we ain't now at the end of MAY and it's still not signed so does this mean that even Mouchel thinks September 2009 is just a pipe dream?
Who knows. Like so much of this scheme, despite Mrs Attwood's assertions that it is no longer shrouded in mystery it clearly still is.
If Mouchel could provide me with a written record of what was actually said that would be of great help as I am working from notes not a transcript. I cannot write that fast but for the next time I will have my voice recorder to hand so I will have a transcript.
However when you dig a bit deeper what it's really about is re-equipping every school in the land, refurbishing sound buildings, demolishing worn out, badly built or badly maintained buildings and replacing them with new.
At this point hundreds of comments to the CN groups News & Star web site were complaining to the contrary and OFSTED went into the Academy 3 weeks later. Out of touch, head in the sand, completely aloof, blind faith, rank incompetence, being fed a line by the sponsors, who honestly knows?
Please read it and judge for yourself.
It is dated 12th January 2006 and is a meeting of yet another group of 'interested parties' made up of other groups of interested parties and observed by yet more groups of interested parties.
This folks is where your council tax is going.
It is basically 'the great and the good' getting together on our behalf to have a meeting, to decide to have a meeting about a meeting.
No wonder there are holes in the road, clapped out street lights etc etc. These clowns are wasting a bloody fortune just chatting amongst themselves!
I honestly think the time has come to clear out bureaucracy once and for all because the more hands the story goes through the more warped and twisted the result.
Her role is to lead and develop all children's services in Cumbria, management of Children's Services in the County Council and leading partnership work across the county with other agencies. Moira also works as a member of the corporate management team to further develop Cumbria County Council.
Forty teachers speak out against suspended Cumbrian headteacher
This would seem to me to have great relevance for every parent in Barrow but guess what the Evening Mail doesn't seem to have the room within it's pages or it's web site to 'print' such 'negativity' about the Academy programme.
Pay close attention to the 'sincere' words of our elected councillors who are determined to close Alfred Barrow down even if they don't manage to close the other two secondary schools.
Bear in mind when looking at these numbers the people at the end of the article Jim Buchanan and Moira Swann put it down in writing that these some of these schools are weak and under perform to such an extent that the pupils in them cannot achieve... and yet here is the statistical proof they DO ACHIEVE.
Why the double standards Cllr Buchanan & Moira Swann?
This chap actually 'gets it' and understands that flexibility and co-operation are the keystones of success. He has no desire to lock our children into a maths and sports straight jacket and honestly if his University were the sole sponsor of this Academy I doubt we would be seeing any of the failings that are currently coming to light ever single day because he is able to plan.
So I went back through the pages of time and pulled out the real nuggets to give her the exposure she deserves.
He's said: ?????????????????????????
Well nothing yet!
About Friday's events at Parkview. Is he on holiday with John Hutton?
Mind, to be fair he did say this just over a year back.
"This is a major step forward to attaining the best educational facilities for the children and young people of Barrow. It is important that in order to attain this goal we work in close partnership with all those involved in the academy process, but most importantly with the community of Barrow."
These are the Year group who have made their choices and as two GCSE courses are 'oversubscribed' and probably all of the Diploma courses are 'under subscribed'. The pupils who are on the oversubscribed courses have been asked if the course is really what they want and it has been 'pointed out' to them that if they stick with the GCSE course they may have to move to 'the other site' to take the course.
After apparently years of planning the sponsors and their managers have failed to allow for the fact that most kids still prefer GCSE to Diploma.
The person who sent me a picture of pallets hasn't got back to me.
But as notnwemail says there is no smoke without fire. Someone somewhere is not telling the truth and if anyone can shed light on who it is please let me know so I can publish the 'proof' on here.
PLANNING 11-16 EDUCATION FOR BARROW CONSULTATION REPORT
An Independent Report by CN Research Commissioned by
School Organisation Project Team
JANUARY 2008
Lynne Wild
Georgia Shorrock
Vicky Johnstone
CN Research
Why have we allowed this situation to come to pass?
A word of advice for the good lady, not that she will listen,
WHEN IN A HOLE STOP DIGGING!
"Furness Academy bosses have said Year 10 courses will continue into Year 11, but said no guarantees were made about the same teachers teaching those courses."
Have the Evening Mail sacked all their reporters?
Just ask any Year 10 at Parkview what Mrs Hughes told them at a Year 10 Assembly. They had four of them knocking on their door last Friday so the reporters didn't have to leave the flipping building, or is what notnwemail saying actually true and the Evening Mail staff are being 'gagged'?
I have asked a Year 10 and she told me Mrs Hughes said "That all current Year 10's WILL have the same teachers through to the end of Year 11"!
Now if this isn't true Mrs Hughes please provide me with your version of what was said so I can publish here for all to see.
I should point out that there is little chance of this happening as Mrs Hughes has a 'directors' job in the Academy should it be created and she will no doubt be kept 'quiet' by some clause or other in her contract.
Is it really getting to the stage where we have to have our children recording everything that is said in case 'The Sponsors' the go on to deny it in print in the 'not so fence sitting' Evening Mail?
It turns out that Dave Kelly's Sixth form College nearly put itself £14M into what it calls 'short term borrowing' which really means debt!
As ever have a read for yourself.
Something fishy or just my interpretation, who knows?
Have a read for yourself and you decide what he is on about.
I was asked to go and have a look at the Barrowafc forum as there was an interesting conversation taking place on their boards about the academy imposition.
Here's what I found
I have the story but it is from an unconfirmed source so cannot post it here. It could show once and for all whether Mr Scowcroft is in or out of the picture.
We simply cannot allow this too happen in Barrow, can we?
It's truly a wonder anyone trains to be a teacher let alone stay in the profession for any length of time which makes the sacking of teachers just to get 'the right' teachers on the Academy bus abhorrent.
It's a PDF with all their manes, who they work for and e-mail addresses in it and I am not publishing it on this site due to spammers. But you are free to download it as it is a publically accessible Local Government document. Here's the link again
This article from the Evening Mail web shows that 'assertion' to be a lie.
Read it for yourself and then ask yourself if they can lie about this what else are they capable of?
13/10/2004 - County Council Cabinet to debate long-term future of Alfred Barrow School
Is it doing this?
Probably not because it only seems to be capable of doing what it is TOLD to do by government!
Anne Attwoods?
The Government?
The Past and Existing Heads?
The Governors?
Roger Titcombes?
OSANFS?
No it's our old friends CCC who have the responsibility of maintaining our schools, all of them, in good order. So if Cllr Buchanan's report cites 'building problems' as a reason for closure, as I am sure it will once I find it, as a Councillor on the Education committe or whatever they call it , well let's say has a lot to answer for.
It's best to search the Cumbria County Council web site using Google as their internal search is abysmal because it tries to be too clever.
Whilst reading through it and I recommend that you do, ask yourself;
- Where in all of this is my opinion?
- Where in all of this is my child's opinions?
- Why wasn't this document drawn up with my involvement?
- Why wasn't this document sent to me and my family for our approval?
If this document was really made public, not stuffed on the Cumbria County Council web site for 'all' to see provided you have internet access, our children wouldn't be in the position they are in now.
Another crystal clear example of the County Council doing the bare minimum to comply with policy, what a shower.
Would the person who sent me a picture of 'pallets in store' this morning please send me it again with their contact details. A hotmail account that is 'no longer in use' isn't good enough!
Workforce Development
The Every Child Matters policy incorporates the challenge of workforce reform - the need to increase the attraction of working with children and young people and especially to further improve training, skills and inter-professional relationships.
We see effective recruitment, retention and development of a high quality school workforce as a significant factor in enhancing school improvement.
We see training and development opportunities for classroom-based staff and effective professional and leadership development as key components in raising standards.
Investment in, and valuing of, the whole school workforce in terms of their development, professional status and work-life balance is an essential element in bringing about school improvement.
To those poor souls in the three schools who do not fit the visions and ethos of Anne Dave, Neil and Doug's 'creation' please re-read this statement because you really are valuable... except you are not, it appears, employable!
As you can seen from this document closure and merger rather than site reduction and remodelling or re-purposing are the blunt instruments that the County Council employ to rid the County of this plague of 'surplus' places.
How did this 'rural' county, some parts are but Carlisle Barrow Whitehaven and Workington can hardly be called rural, manage to make such a cock up of secondary education?
As I say I hope they didn't have a clue. Perhaps one or all of them would care to e-mail me to put the record straight.
From the Furness Academy web site
I do realise he should have perhaps blown the whistle himself or just not claimed anything but as Steve Forbes found out when he became a local councillor and tried to change things for the better 'expenses' are an entrenched part of government national or local.
I have copied the relevant bits of the e-mail and 'The Sponsors' response for you to show you the differences.
or you can phone or fax him here
House of Commons Phone number: 020 7219 6228
House of Commons Fax number: 020 7219 2418
Constituency Phone number: 01229 431204
Constituency Fax number: 01229 432016
Here is the contact page from his web site
http://www.johnhuttonmp.co.uk/contact_me.asp
It is with great pleasure I post this link to a web site that is reporting news items that the Evening Mail for whatever reason, it may be legalities, it may be bias, it may be conflict of interest at a local level, it may be conflict of interest at a national level, it may be contractually obliged not to report certain things, but they clearly are not publishing an awful lot of things.
As I said earlier model competitions, secret millionaire and big white boats are more important to them than the Academy. Their printing press broke down again on Thursday so when the press hall is closed, throwing more Barrovians out of work, and the paper is printed 'up north' they will have to print tomorrows paper today just in case the single remaining print room conks out. God know how they will get the papers through to Barrow if we have a 'normal' British winter!
Anyway here is the link
Just go and read their page to see just how mature yet angry these teenagers really are. It puts my generation of head hangers to shame.
Anyway moving on I may have stumbled across something that shows why there is such a headlong rush by the sponsors. Gordon is wanting to give PARENTS more control over schools. It seems that Academies may not be included in this parent power initiative. Have a read and make let me know what you think.
I am well aware that not all Academy schemes are doomed to failure. Some bring about real and great long lasting improvements to those who pass through their doors. I am working on an article at present about one of these successes and it is truly fantastic what the principal, his staff and the children in one part of Luton have achieved.
However the Cumbrian fasttrack system has had two failures, at different levels, but failures nonetheless and I can honestly see the warning signs that Barrow is heading down the same road lighting up one after the other with increasing frequency and Friday's scenes at Parkview, at the Evening Mail offices and in my own home show me that there are real and genuine problems with the current plan that cannot be ignored. At least they can't if you really do care about getting your child the best state education possible.
So no I am not anti academy per se.
I do believe Academies in and of themselves do not guarantee an improvement in a child's education. There are many different types of school in Britain that out perform the best of the Academies year in year out.
- I do not believe Alfred Barrow, Thorncliffe or Parkview are so 'broken' that they deserve to be replaced lock stock and barrel with the current Academy plan.
- I do believe that spending money every year on each school to improve the quality of the children's education is a far better use of scarce funds than closure, demolition and rebuilds because schools need two things above all else that money cannot buy. Teachers who are allowed to be effective and dedicated communicators and children who want to learn.
- I believe that all three schools have these things in varying numbers and yes all three schools can and should aim to match Dowdale's results first whilst aiming for Chetwynde's but as I said cash, dreams, visions and ethos cannot and will never achieve these results. People will.
All I am hearing is negative chatter about how the process was done and 'good people' not getting employment.
I have seen first hand the impact of Friday's announcements as I have two children at Parkview and it doesn't seem right that kids should be exposed to this but you people must now stand up and show me and anyone who reads this blog why YOU think the Academy is better than the existing.
You will no doubt be 'advised' not to say anything in case it reflects badly but please ignore such advice. You are teachers not MI5 agents and children's education is your number one priority, it has to be because there are much better paid and hassle free jobs out there.
So if you can throw some much needed light on why you are pleased to be part of this fantastic opportunity please do so today.
Thanks in advance,
Derek.
You may submit articles for consideration here
blog AT furnessacademy DOT com
obviously making the 'AT' a @ and the 'DOT' a .
They have revelled in this new found freedom and the decision to close the three Barrow Secondarys is typical of their idea of 'democracy in action'.
Getting drunk on power is probably too strong a term but getting tipsy isn't!
I just hope he is free on June 1st at 11-00 am to come and support 'his' pupils.
It is in a long PDF so I have copied it below. Please read it through and the e-mail, ring, write or fax John to let him know your feelings. Full contact details are available on his web site here.
The way in which they told members of staff at Parkview and Thorncliffe schools, which still exist incidentally until the day Balls, or whoever replaces him signs off, on the funding deal, is shocking and disgusting especially as it was the last day of the half term and they are all going their separate ways for a week. Amateur politicking of the worst kind!
I have had no news from Alfred Barrow School as regards their staff but it must make for a very long 'half term holiday' if they are trying to enjoy themselves but dreading what may await them on June 1st.
Anyway it's the weekend and it's time for a new logo competition.
I've been to the Academy web site and come across a most extraordinary statement from 'The Sponsors' entitled 'Academy Uniform Rumours' which looks and reads for all the world like classic spin doctoring courtesy of a PR company.
I've copied it in full below and of course added my comments in bold.
It is also worth looking at this school because if The Bridge Across the Bay ever becomes reality then as this school is in Lancaster it will be 15 minutes or so away from every home in Barrow so it opens up a whole new world of choice for our children.
That school is Lancaster Royal Grammar school. It is a selective voluntary aided school.
Please please go and read this. It's all put together by kids within Parkview and it's clear they are as much in the dark as any of us and are incensed at the way these 'committed educationalists are treating them and their teachers.
If half of it is true it is truly disgusting and shows rank incompetence on the part of the sponsors and their 'chosen one'. How bad does it have to get?
Planned maximum number 1200
Forms of Entry: 8
Admissions Number: 240
About 4-30pm today I clicked on their 'The Academy have your say link'
and the paragraph at the top said
"The prospect of an academy opening in Barrow has had Evening Mail readers sending in their comments by the thousands."
"I have just clicked back on the link at 8.25 pm and it now says
The prospect of an academy opening in Barrow has had Evening Mail readers sending in their comments by the hundreds."
As ever draw your own conclusions as to what is going on.
It makes me sick. They should be...you really do not want to know what I am feeling at this moment in time.
That's it.
Ben Fisher
Year 7 pupil at Parkview
It is worth noting that as with many other Academy schemes the 'idea' of creating Academies in Cumbria came from the DCSF. They appear to have approached the County not the other way round as many believe.
It is a long document so there will be a few parts to this dissection of what it says and when reading it always bear in mind what is actually happening not what 'they said would happen'.
As it's header says it is ' leading debate, raising aspirations, celebrating achievement'.
Well it manages to achieve the last one very well 'celebrating achievement' however it doesn't know the meaning of the word debate and qualifies the 'raising aspirations' by raising them the 'Furness college' way.
Many of the staff were in tears and those that weren't were dejected and angry according to my Year 11.
My younger son arrived with similar tales of tears and very angry teachers.
I have no more information as yet but as soon as it land it will be posted to this blog.
Doug first rose to prominence as a deputy headmaster at Thorne Grammar School in Doncaster. His appointment was made by Dr Brookes the Thorne Headmaster.
Two years later Dr Brookes retired and Doug became 'acting' Headmaster for the last twelve months of Thorne's existence.
It is worth pointing out that the Whitehaven News & Star and the Evening Mail are both titles in Cumbrian News Group's portfolio and stories from 'our neck of the woods' often appear in Whitehaven's paper. However this story which is very relevant to what is going on in Barrow failed to make it down the A591 or across the wires of Cumbrian Newspapers. Odd but an editorial decision is an editorial decision. Draw your own conclusions as to why it wasn't printed in the Evening Mail
The government, the council and the sponsor are playing games with children's education in a most obscene manner. They facing so much opposition for precisely the same reasons that there is so much opposition to Furness Academy. They didn't actually involve parents, pupils and staff from day one.
Read on...
What stands out from the Camden example is that is Ed Balls DCSF that is driving the Camden Academy creation in the same way they were the instigators of Cumbria's fast track Academies.
It also reminds me of Tronics new building in Ulverston which is of course a factory.
Just what is wrong with schools looking like a schools?
What has to be noted in this particular Academy is this bit
"The Academy has around 1700 students aged between 11 and 19, housed over two main sites, in one of the most socio-economically deprived areas of Nottingham."...
I have never heard of this book 'The Great City Academy Fraud' by Francis Beckett and have therefore not yet read it. However at least two people have and their reviews follow.
As every parent knows £60 will go nowhere near a decent quality uniform. When my youngest joined his secondary school last year we spent around £170 on his uniform as he needed two of everything. We saved money as well by only buying the things we couldn't get anywhere else from identity but people we know who got everything from Identity paid in excess of £230.
What the government fails to realise is that this wonderful thing called the Internet makes any speech anywhere by any minister available worldwide. They seem to have no comprehension that people like you and me actually search out and read this stuff or they are too aloof to realise that we have an interest.
The Furness Academy sponsors and even MC2 the sponsors 'PR' and 'marketing company seem to have the same failing.
I have highlighted the words and phrases which 'our' sponsors and the principal have been rolling out time and time again since October 2007.
"If it is said often enough people will begin to believe it."
This is a truism of marketing.
As you can see the DCSF see nothing wrong with having an alleged adulterer as head principal in a school. What it shows is that the sponsors can do no wrong in the eyes of the DCSF which goes a long way to prove what Mr Titcombe has said all along that the sponsors have no public accountability.
This cannot be right.
If our MP's who do have FULL public accountability and yet can spend taxpayers money with gay abandon and then pay it back and issue a trite apology for getting caught it is morally wrong to hand over three of our schools, all of their pupils, their staff, their buildings and land and all of their equipment to three people who appear to be above public scrutiny.
Alfred Barrow children seem to have been identified as needing special attention probably because they are the only ones who are actually having to move to other school buildings. What's more they are being told which of the other two school sites they are going to be attending rather than being asked which one they would prefer to go to.
This makes it clear that all pupils are not considered equal.
I am frankly still at a loss after lots of reading to work out who belongs to this body or if it even exists in reality.
It appears to be an excercise run by the National College For School Leadership and also it seems to have been created by something called the Barrow Education Action Zone back in 2003-2004 and according to this PDF it is made up of representatives of all secondary schools and colleges in the town.
Given that the process only went 'public' on the Furness Academy site on the 19th May is this just another example of the fast tracking of everything Academy?
Read on..
The page link is http://www.pvcct.org/parkview_info.asp?ID=PROD&catID=3
This rather grand title gives the impression that the entire Secondary education system was going to be transformed but as events have proved this is not the case.
This blog will be transparent from the off.
- I have two children currently at Parkview.
- I am in direct contact with one of the sponsors and one of the OSANFS group but I have no affiliation with either.
- There will be no commenting on this blog.
- All articles submitted are moderated by me and me alone.
- I am the sole arbiter of what goes on this blog and what doesn't.
- If you want an article published on here you have to provide me with your full name as it will go on the end of the article.
- Personal abuse in words will not be published on the site. Unlike the Evening Mail which simply doesn't publish without informing the contributor why they didn't publish. I will e-mail you to tell you why your article wasn't published and offer you the chance to do a re-write.
The views contained within the individual posts submitted by anyone other than myself are always the views of the named contributors only.
One final thing.
Any articles submitted that are based on an web page that is already in the public domain MUST include a valid link to that page or it will not be published on the blog.
You may submit articles for consideration here
blog AT furnessacademy DOT com
obviously making the 'AT' a @ and the 'DOT' a .
That's the boring bit over and done with.